2017 Venezuelan constitutional crisis

2017 Venezuelan constitutional crisis

Part of Crisis in Venezuela
The Supreme Tribunal of Justice (TSJ) meeting on 28 March 2017.
Location	Venezuela
Cause	National Assembly is dissolved and stripped of legislative powers and parliamentary immunity. Supreme Court assumes control of legislative powers.
Outcome	Internal and international condemnation. Supreme Court partially reverses decision after facing criticism. Strengthening of 2017 Venezuelan protests[1][2][3][4] Maduro calls a Constituent Assembly to replace the 1999 Constitution of Venezuela

Part of a series on the
History of Venezuela
Chronology
Pre-Columbian period 1522–1821 1821–30 1830–1908 1908–58 1948–58 1953–99 1999–present
Topics
New Spain Province of Venezuela Viceroyalty of New Granada Captaincy General American Confederation of Venezuela War of Independence First Republic Second Republic Third Republic Caudillismo Revolution of the Reforms 1848–1849 civil war March Revolution Federal War Blue Revolution April Revolution Revindicating Revolution Legalist Revolution Andean Hegemony Restorative Liberal Revolution Liberating Revolution 1902–03 blockade 1908 coup Oil industry history Generation of 1928 El Trienio Adeco Democratic period 1958 coup Punto Fijo Pact Carupanazo Porteñazo Caracazo February 1992 coup attempt November 1992 coup attempt Bolivarian Revolution Vargas tragedy 2002 coup attempt 2002–03 general strike 2004 recall referendum 2007 RCTV protests Death and state funeral of Hugo Chávez Crisis in Venezuela
Venezuela portal
v t e

On 29 March 2017, the Supreme Tribunal of Justice (TSJ) of Venezuela took over legislative powers of the National Assembly.^[5][6][7] The Tribunal, mainly supporters of President Nicolás Maduro,^[8] also restricted the immunity granted to the Assembly's members, who mostly belonged to the opposition.^[9]

The dissolution was considered by the opposition to be a "coup"^[10][11][12] while the Organization of American States (OAS) termed the action a "self-coup".^{[13][1][2][3]} The decision was condemned by some media outlets with analysts characterizing the move as a turn towards authoritarianism and one-man rule.^[14]

Politicians throughout the Americas, as well as leaders from the United Nations, expressed concern with the decision and demanded its reversal, though the Venezuelan government stated no coup had taken place and instead justified its decision as a reaction to "coup-like actions" allegedly performed by the opposition.^[7]

On 1 April 2017, the TSJ partially reversed its decision, thereby reinstating the powers of the National Assembly.^[15] Public dissatisfaction with the decision persisted however, with the strengthening of the protests that year "into the most combative since a wave of unrest in 2014" resulting from the crisis.^[4]